Question from Margot L.:
I recently saw a Progressive Insurance commercial about a new discount program. The commercial stated that the program was patented. Is that true?
-Margot L.

I have also seen this commercial and yes, the program is patented. The commercial is referring to Progressive Insurance’s Snapshot discount program. The program bases customer rates on the number of miles and time of day driven and how often sudden stops are made. A device which connects to a cars computer sends information to the company to determine the rates.

Progressive has received a few patents for the methods and systems used in this program. United States Patent 5,797,134 was issued to Progressive Casualty Insurance Company on August 18, 1998 for a motor vehicle monitoring system for determining a cost of insurance. The company also received United States Patent 6,064,970 on May 16, 2000 for Motor vehicle monitoring system for determining a cost of insurance. Then on March 15, 2005, United States Patent 6,868,386 was issued for a monitoring system for determining and communicating a cost of insurance.

Microwave Oven PatentYou can add the microwave oven to the list of products invented by accident. Dr. Percy Spencer was not trying to invent a faster way to cook when he discovered the principal behind the microwave oven. Instead, Spencer was working for the Raytheon Corporation testing a new type of vacuum tube known as a magnetron. One day, he discovered that a candy bar which he had in his pocket had melted while working with the magnetron. This led to many more experiments with the tube.

The first two foods to be intentionally heated with the tube were popcorn and an egg. Spencer put some popcorn kernels near the tube and watched as the popcorn cracked and pop in the lab. Then, Spencer tried the experiment with an egg. The internal temperature of the egg rose causing it to explode when placed near the tube. Continue reading “A Quick Hot Dog: Invention of the Microwave”

Bubble Wrap PatentIn 1957, Alfred W. Fielding and Marc Chavannes set out to make a new type of wallpaper. Instead, they changed the world of packaging. They were attempting to develop an easy to install and clean wallpaper with a paper backing. The partners sealed two shower curtains together creating a cluster of small bubbles between the two layers. For this invention, they received U.S. Patent No. 3,142,599 on July 28, 1964 for a Method for Making Laminated Cushioning Material.

The product was unsuccessful as wallpaper. Looking for other ways to use the plastic, the duo even tried to sell it as greenhouse insulation. The use of the air cushioned material as protective packaging was discovered later. Continue reading “Shower Curtain Packing Material? Invention of Bubble Wrap”

Question from Mike:
What was the teakettle that Chester Greenwood invented and patented, and are there any pictures of it?
-Mike

Chester Greenwood received US Patent 1,716,124 on June 4, 1929 for a teakettle. Greenwood’s teakettle had a circular bottom edge and a leg that extended horizontally underneath the spout. The bottom edge of a regular teakettle often wears underneath the spout from being tilted to pour. The leg on Greenwood’s teakettle supported the kettle when tilted reducing the wear of the bottom of the kettle.

View Chester Greenwood’s Patent.

Did you know that “Q-Tip”, “Dumpster” and “Thermos” were all trademarks at one time? Once simply brand names for “cotton swabs”, “large waste can” and “vacuum flask” respectively, all have since lost their trademark status to one common problem: genericization.

Bayer AspirinGenericized trademarks are words that used to be brand names but have become ingrained in common speech as a way to refer to all brands of a single product, not just the brand or service of the original trademark holder. A trademark often becomes genericized when one company dominates the market for a single product or is the original manufacturer of a new product. The use of a trademark as a verb will also led to the term becoming generic. Continue reading “Say This, Not That: Trademark Genericization”

Question from Harold G.:
Who figured out the ammonium nitrate instant ice packs first? Did they patent it?
-Harold G.

Albert A. Robbins applied for an application for chemical freezing packs on June 15, 1956. He received US Patent 2,898,744 on August 11, 1959. The patent was assigned to Kwik-Kold of America. Kwik-Kold brand instant ice packs are still manufactured and sold by Cardinal Health.

View the patent for the instant ice pack here.

Cherry Sundae AdOn Sunday, April 3, Google celebrated the anniversary of the first ice cream sundae with one of its famous Google Doodles. But the invention of the sundae celebrated by Google is only one of the stories about how the ice cream treat came to exist. For years, there has been an ongoing debate about how and where the sundae was invented.

Google and their doodle celebrated the anniversary of the sundae on April 3. Folks in Ithaca, New York claim that on April 3, 1892, Chester Platt who owned the Platt & Colt’s drugstore, concocted the first ice cream sundae. Reverend John M. Scott visited the store for his usual dish of vanilla ice cream after church services on Sunday. Platt decided to liven up the vanilla ice cream with cherry syrup and top it with a cherry. Scott loved the ice cream and purposed that the treat be called a Cherry Sunday after the day it was created. On April 5, 1892, Platt placed an ad in the Ithaca Daily Journal for his new 10-cent ice cream specialty. Continue reading “A Cherry on Top – Invention of the Ice Cream Sundae”

Question from Keith S.:
Why do patents get reissued?
-Keith S.

Patents can be reissued for a number of errors. The original error must have been an accident or mistake. The error must not have been intentional or purposely deceptive. Errors which can be corrected by reissuing a patent include defective drawings or specifications, improperly referenced documents and claims which are either too broad or too narrow.

Patent claims which are too narrow may not provide all of the protection which is entitled. Broad claims can invalidate a patent. To broaden the claims of a patent, the reissue application must be filed within two years of the date the patent was granted. An application to narrow the claims may be filed at any time before the expiration of the patent. A reissued patent does not change the expiration. The patent still expires twenty years after the original granted date.

Leonardo da Vinci is known first and foremost as painter. His work includes the most famous portrait of all time, the Mona Lisa. Da Vinci was also a scientist and an inventor. More of his time was spent studying science than painting. Years after his death, it became known
that he had made important discoveries in many fields including anatomy, engineering and technology. His discoveries were found in notebooks that contain more than 13,000
pages of drawings, notes and observations.

It seems that da Vinci had planned to publish a great book of knowledge but this never happened. Instead after his death, his notebooks were scattered and can now be found in the museum collections. Although these books were very hard to read with their mirror image writing, incomplete notes, and strange spellings, the many drawings in the books prove that da Vinci had ideas for many advancements that would not have even been possible in during his
lifetime. This ideas included a helicopter, tank and solar power among others.

Below are a few of the sketches for various inventions that were found in his notebooks.

Question from C. George:
Who gets the right to put “patent pending” on a product? Do they have to file a patent application first or what?
-C. George

The term “patent pending” may be used by a manufacturer to indicate that a patent for the product has been filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. This statement has no legal implication as the protection provided by a patent does not actually begin until the patent is granted. Basically, “patent pending” serves as a warning that duplicating the product could result in being liable for damages and possible legal action if and when a patent is issued.

Falsely using the term “patent pending” can result in a fine for deceiving the public. A fine of up to $500 can be sought for each usage of “patent pending” when no application has been filed.